XCOM: Enemy Unknown Screenshot

When rumblings of a new X-com game first hit the gaming scene a few years ago, fans were understandably excited. The classic SRPG series helped define the genre and is considered one of the greatest and most influential of all time. Fan disappointment was also understandable, then, when it was revealed that the new X-com game was going to be a first-person shooter developed by 2K Marin, a far cry from what fans were used to or wanting. That game, simply titled XCOM, has sat in limbo, restarted and re-imagined several times and caught in development doldrums. A rather ignominious end to the storied franchise.

Enter, Firaxis, the developers of the equally legendary and revered Civilization series. The latest edition of Game Informer revealed XCOM: Enemy Unknown, a strategy game that will be instantly familiar to fans and has quickly surpassed XCOM in terms of importance and fan fervor.

XCOM: Enemy Unknown Screenshot

From the latest issue of Game Informer:

Wasn’t there another XCOM game?
Yes, 2K Marin is developing a previously announced first-person shooter, simply called XCOM. That game was originally scheduled to come out last year, but has since been delayed out of 2011.

How do those games relate to each other?
The shooter takes place earlier in the fiction, chronicling the aliens’ first attacks in the United States. The strategy game we’re talking about here deals with the global response to the later full-blown alien invasion of Earth.

So this is some kind of RTS?
No, not in the way the term “RTS” typically applies to games like StarCraft. The real-time element of XCOM is confined to the global view, where the player keeps track of known UFOs and abductions going on around the world. Managing research and development at the XCOM organization’s secret base can be done at the player’s leisure, and all combat is completely turn-based.

You switch between real-time and turn-based?
Yes. When your aerial transport lands at an abduction site, the game switches to a tactical view and you command your squad of personalized soldiers in battle against an unknown alien threat.

So what do you do in the real-time global view?
On the strategic layer, players direct research into alien technology, give their engineers and foundries fabrication requests, interact with the nations of the world (who have to be mollified to secure funding for XCOM), intercept airborne UFOs with jet fighters, level up their soldiers and recruit new ones, and dispatch the Skyranger transport to engage alien incursions on the ground.

Is this a remake of the original?
Kind of. Re-imagining is probably a better term. Firaxis’ XCOM: Enemy Unknown doesn’t directly copy the underlying game systems – for instance, soldiers have different stats than they did in the 1994 original – but the concepts are still here. Players still have to manage multiple resources and threats on a global scale in a seemingly hopeless war against extraterrestrial forces with far better technology and capabilities.

Is this going to be dumbed down for the “wider console audience”?
Firaxis is undeniably streamlining aspects of the game and removing no small amount of micromanagement, but from what I’ve seen I wouldn’t call it “dumbing down” the game so much as getting rid of tedium and uninteresting mechanics. Soldiers still die permanently, fog of war and line of sight are hugely important in combat, and you absolutely can lose the game if you screw up too badly.

Does it look awesome?
I came away from our visit to Firaxis’ studio extremely impressed by XCOM: Enemy Unknown. The project is far from done, but I am personally thrilled at the prospect of playing the final game.

2D base-building? Firaxis-developed strategy gameplay? X-com universe? Yes, please. Sign me up. There is a god.

More on XCOM: Enemy Unknown can be found on the official website.

Discussion
  • Ben Godby January 9, 2012 at 11:18 am

    This is the original game with new graphics – and less features to support the fools who play on XBOX. This is what happened to Fallout. This is why I hate the gaming industry.

  • aidan January 9, 2012 at 12:08 pm

    Whu? Fallout was anything but the original game with new graphics. Isn’t the best thing for a series like XCOM to go back to its roots, shine things up with some new graphics and re-embrace the series’ original strengths? What would you have preferred to have seen?

  • Miles January 9, 2012 at 7:29 pm

    He would have preferred to see the original released to be compatible with current day OS’, the publisher fall into obscurity when the game doesn’t sell, and the rest of the original XCOM’s fans to say, ‘Wait, where’s the draw for me to play this? I played it a million times back in ’94, there’s nothing new to see.’

    At least, that’s what I got out of it, Aidan.

  • Leave a Response