{"id":13981,"date":"2013-12-11T09:25:59","date_gmt":"2013-12-11T17:25:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/aidanmoher.com\/blog\/?p=13981"},"modified":"2013-12-11T09:25:59","modified_gmt":"2013-12-11T17:25:59","slug":"so-about-those-elves-peter-jackson-discusses-the-desolation-of-smaug","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/aidanmoher.com\/blog\/2013\/12\/news\/so-about-those-elves-peter-jackson-discusses-the-desolation-of-smaug\/","title":{"rendered":"So… about those elves. Peter Jackson discusses The Desolation of Smaug<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"\"The-Hobbit-Desolation-of-Smaug-Poster2\"\n

If there’s one takeaway from the first film in Peter Jackson’s film adaptation of The Hobbit<\/em>, it’s that the writer\/director’s tinkering with Tolkien’s lore, ostensibly for the sake of making a more bloated<\/del> exciting theatre-going experience, was less than successful. The additions of Azog, Radagast’s plight against the Necromancer, the absurdity in the hall of the Goblin King, and anything to do with the White Council were unnecessary to Bilbo’s story (which, at the end of the day, is what The Hobbit<\/em> should be about), and raised concerns about the decision to extend the series of films<\/a> from two volumes into a trilogy.<\/p>\n

On the eve of the release of the second film, The Desolation of Smaug<\/em>, Peter Jackson recently discussed the decision to add and expand on the characters of three elves, including fan favourite Legolas, played again by Orlando Bloom, and newcomer Tauriel, played by Evangeline Lily. “People always ask about Evangeline’s character Tauriel and why we felt the need to create her,” Jackson said, via \/Film<\/a>. “But in The Hobbit novel, [the dwarves] are captured by the elves and they escape in the barrels. And it\u2019s a memorable part of the book but the Elf King is not even named. He doesn\u2019t have a name. And it was only later on that Tolkien decided it should be Thranduil and he also decided he should have a son when Lord of the Rings was written 18-19 years later. He created the character of the son of the king.<\/p>\n\"tauriel-the-hobbit\"\n

So you\u2019ve got material there but you can\u2019t have a scene in a film that\u2019s a memorable scene with just one person as the Elf. We wanted three Elven characters. That\u2019s the thing too, to create characters and have conflict with each other and they have different agendas. Thranduil, Legolas and Tauriel are all on different flight paths which makes it much more interesting ability for Fran and I to tell the narrative through their eyes.”<\/p>\n

Jackson’s reasoning is sound. Raising the viewer’s engagement and emotional attachment to the film by creating new named and recognizable characters is admirable and probably for the best of the film. That being said, Bilbo and the dwarf’s experience with the wood elves is one of captor\/captives\/burgular, and the mysterious, nameless elves are part of the fun. Bilbo has to navigate their kingdom without the ability to interact or communicate with them directly.<\/p>\n

More concerning, however, is his suggestion that Thranduil, Legolas and Tauriel all have ‘different agendas.’ Getting back to the idea that these films should be about Bilbo’s journey, I’m not terribly certain that I care<\/em> what the elves are doing from a political standpoint. Jackson might use the screen time and ‘conflict’ between these characters to better describe the tension between the elves and the dwarves, casting further speculation on the elf army’s involvement at the end of the novel, then fine and good. Adding storylines about brooding elf princes and romance? Save it for the extended edition, please.<\/p>\n

One valid criticism of The Hobbit<\/em> (and most of Tolkien’s work in general, to be frank) is its lack of any female characters. In fact, I can’t think of one woman in the entire book who has a line of dialogue. Despite the potential pitfalls (like an already confirmed romantic storyline), the addition of an engaging and important female character (so, you know, fans have a new type of hero to cheer for beyond the brooding dwarf, the handsome dwarf, the wizard, and the hobbit), is a positive addition from at least one perspective.<\/p>\n

Early reviews of the film have been favourable, sitting at a respectable 79% on Rotten Tomatoes<\/a>. “The Desolation of Smaug” is quite nearly a great Hobbit film,” says Jonathan Lack of We Got This Covered<\/a>, “filled with wondrous invention, genuine pathos, and many great performances.” And Tim Grierson of Deadspin<\/a> almost agrees. He says, “This is a perfectly solid, diverting film. So was the last one. Go in with measured expectations and you’ll have nothing to fear — or be disappointed by.” And, that, at the end of the day, is all there is. With tempered expectations, and understanding that the Tolkien fan in me will have to take a back seat to the Jackson fan, I’m curious and eager for the lights to go down and the curtain to raise on The Desolation of Smaug<\/em>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

If there’s one takeaway from the first film in Peter Jackson’s film adaptation of The Hobbit, it’s that the writer\/director’s tinkering with Tolkien’s lore, ostensibly for the sake of making a more bloated exciting theatre-going experience, was less than successful. The additions of Azog, Radagast’s plight against the Necromancer, the absurdity in the hall of… The Desolation of Smaug<\/em>“>Read more »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":40,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":""},"categories":[39],"tags":[38,413,145,292,663,146,143],"class_list":["post-13981","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","tag-fantasy","tag-film","tag-j-r-r-tolkien","tag-peter-jackson","tag-the-desolation-of-smaug","tag-the-hobbit","tag-the-lord-of-the-rings"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n