{"id":190,"date":"2008-06-26T13:46:14","date_gmt":"2008-06-26T21:46:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/aidanmoher.com\/blog\/?p=190"},"modified":"2008-06-26T13:46:14","modified_gmt":"2008-06-26T21:46:14","slug":"i-ask-you-reviews","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/aidanmoher.com\/blog\/2008\/06\/news\/i-ask-you-reviews\/","title":{"rendered":"I Ask You | Reviews"},"content":{"rendered":"

My first edition<\/a> of I Ask You<\/strong> went over better than I had anticipated, with a lot of great input from my readers. That one was focused around interviews and it’s had a direct impact on how I approach my interviews.<\/p>\n

To that end, I thought it was about time for another edition. This time I wanted to tackle a subject that has seen a fair bit of discussion over the past several weeks around the ‘net: Reviews<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

\n

What makes for a good, interesting review?<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Some things to think about: How much plot synopsis do you like? Do you like in depth literary reviews full of quotations, passages from the novel, solid examples? Or more off the cuff reviews? Who are some of your favourite reviewers? Whose reviews do you not enjoy a whole lot?<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

My first edition of I Ask You went over better than I had anticipated, with a lot of great input from my readers. That one was focused around interviews and it’s had a direct impact on how I approach my interviews. To that end, I thought it was about time for another edition. This time… Read more »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":40,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":""},"categories":[39],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-190","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"yoast_head":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n